So saùnh veà kinh phí, phöông aùn 3

So saùnh veà kinh phí, phöông aùn 3-I ñöôïc löïa choïn, vì kinh phí cuûa phöông aùn 3-II bao goàm caû chi phí vaän haønh vaø baûo trì trong suoát thôøi gian 50 naêm cuûa tuoåi thoï döï aùn ñöôïc öôùc tính laø gaáp 1.6 ñeán 3 laàn kinh phí cuûa phöông aùn 3-I nhö trình baøy trong Hình 3.6. Nhaän ñònh naøy ñöôïc khaúng ñònh bôûi nghieân cöùu töông töï cho qui hoaïch phaùt trieån Long Tröôøng vôùi dieän tích khoaûng 9,0 km2 trong vuøng Ñoâng
Nam ( SE )

結果 (英文) 1:

Comparison of methods for project funding, about 3-I are selection, because the funding of local projects 3-II including the cost of operation and in the 50-year span of the project is estimated to cost 1.6 earning more than 3 times of Governments 3-conviction I like presentation in Figure 3.6. Recipient is defined by the khaúng to research similar to the Long development plans with School Regulations respectively, area of about 9.0 km2 in area codes With (SE)

結果 (英文) 2:

Comparison about funding, Scenario 3-I were selected, because budget-II's Scenario 3 includes bridge and lower running costs of lifelong mainte 50-year period of time covered Project's age was estimated Lao fold 1.6 to 3 times in Scenario 3's expense-I is as presented in Figure 3.6. Receive Indication alternative center is emphasizing the digging for qui Similarly studies of developmental PLAN Long School with approximately 9.0 km2 flood area in the region East
South (SE)